![]() |
| People thought they were made from Classics. |
Just what kind of chips did these people think they were eating -- casino? Micro? Cow? Dumb question. It doesn't matter what they thought because they didn't care. All they knew was crispy, salty goodness! It's opioids for the tastebuds, and just as healthy.
![]() |
| Campbell's felt obliged to tell their customers they weren't eating the real thing. |
Lay's Tatergate incident came on the heels of the Campbell's Soup cybersecurity chief getting fired for being recorded claiming that their product was highly processed "bio-engineered meat" for "poor people". (His racist comments about Cambell's Indian employees were just the icing on the chicken noodle.)
Yet his comment on the quality of the soup isn't necessarily off the mark. My childhood memory of Campbell's Soup is that the major ingredient, no matter the flavor, was salt. And as for it being the food of "poor people" -- that's because poor people either can't afford or have no access to fresh ingredients to make their own soup.
The higher quality canned soups are out of their reach as well. Rao's chicken noodle soup can run up to four times the cost of Campbell's -- you tell me what they're going to buy even if the government wasn't cutting their SNAP benefits.
Will Lay's see a spike in sales once they start slapping a picture of a potato on their bags? Probably not. People either buy chips regularly or they don't, no matter what the label looks like. And most don't look at the ingredients of anything they eat, which was lucky for those who ate mock turtle soup back in the day. Imagine a picture of the main ingredient on the Campbell's label:
***********************



1 comment:
That’s weird even for this country.
Post a Comment