Oh, hell, what am I talking about? Despite what the movie's prologue states, there was no such person as Sir Herbert Winstead. And by the way, seventy-five percent of Ingagi''s footage was stolen from a 1915 documentary Heart of Africa; the rest was filmed in the heart of California.
And as for those tribe of women... well, they're the only portion that justified Ingagi's existence in 1930 -- although the word "justified" is questionable in relation to the human beings onscreen. Let's just say there would have been no audience patronizing Ingagi without its final 15 minutes.
Judging by how audiences were fooled, I'd say Darwin was wrong. |
The idea that audiences accepted someone named Sir Hubert Winstead speaking with a New York accent, pronouncing "first" as "foist" and "search" as "soich", is the first tip-off of just how gullible people were. The real narrator, Louis Nizor, sounds like he's reading the script for the first time, which is probably the case. Rehearsals take time, and time is money!
Then there's the film quality itself. While the California-as-Africa scenes are in fine condition, the real documentary footage -- only 15 years old at the time -- appears to have been trampled on by an elephant herd before being left out in the sun too long.
Luncheon is served. |
But at least their meat was sustenance for the tribal population. But what was the point of trapping monkeys for anything other than our amusement? Come to think of it, maybe that was enough.
One more wisecrack, and this ape is ready to pounce. |
An extra 10 points for this guy keeping a straight face. |
No matter. We're assured that his dog died three hours after being bitten by this mini-monster. Did I refer to audiences as "gullible"? Make that anencephalic.
Most movies ran only three days, so the people of La Crosse clearly desired a week of interspecies sex. |
I would have taken a screenshot, but just watching things unfold made me feel ashamed. My idea of the Central Casting description will have to do: Negro women wanted to play African natives in love with a gorilla. Must move as if mentally deficient. Total nudity required. $1 for one day's work.
It's worse than it sounds, a degrading scene that these poor women likely welcomed just for the money. One woman holds a baby (or doll) described as having a face more gorilla than human, which tells you what the filmmakers are trying to get across without actually saying it.
Look out! It's a man in a monkey suit! |
That his suit looks absolutely nothing like the real thing we see in close-ups makes no difference. Just the idea of a black woman and a gorilla making monkey business was enough to get the cash registers jingling.
The reverse P.O.V. of the cameraman filming the gorilla. Did audiences think it was filming him? |
Twenty years later, Ingagi was on a double-bill with a renamed Freaks. That's entertainment! |
As movie restrictions lessened in the 1960s, the "doc-shock" genre became known as "mondo", thanks to Mondo Cane. Subsequent movies upped the ante (real or faked) with Traces of Death, Faces of Death, Shocking Africa, Shocking Asia... you get the picture.
As for the movie that started it all, Ingagi ran in grind houses for decades, proving that audiences never smarten up. After disappearing in the 1970s, a print was found in, of all places, the Library of Congress, and restored to 4K with its original tints. Feel free to pick up a copy, but don't tell them I sent you. Let me retain what little pride I have.
*********
Read about White Gorilla here.
Read about Are We Civilized? here.
No comments:
Post a Comment